Saturday, August 12, 2000
6:00 PM
Lately, my sessions with my personal trainer at the gym have involved intellectual excercise in addition to physical exercise. Not that he gives me hard math questions or anything. We merely have conversations in which I strongly stand by my convictions of Logic et al. while he proceeds to wonder and question about various things that he believes hints at something supernatural or beyond science in whatever way.
What I find intriguing, not only of him but of a lot of people, is that his stance is inconsistent with what he preaches by professionthat being fitness, nutrition, and having a healthy lifestyle. Whereas in that area I go by the conventional wisdom (e.g., hitting the target heart rate for maximal fat-burning), he is very skeptical with what doesn’t completely concurr with he latest findings in his field of expertise.
During our last session, he said that it was intersting how I have a scientific point of view and the he doesn’t. I didn’t say anything immediately after that, but I have been thinking all this time as to what I could have, or should have, said. And I finally got the best come-back to thatasking him if he meant that he didn’t have a point of view or if that his point of view was non-scientific. By saying that I had a scientific point of view while he didn’t implied that I had a fixed (i.e., rigid) worldview that he needn’t worry about. Maybe that was exactly what he meant, but if so, he’d have been wrong.
Where’s Socrates when you need him?
6:30 PM
I just remembered that my personal trainer actually said that I “have a very scientific mind” and that he doesn’t. So it’s mind , not point of view. My response above may still apply, though not in the same exact way. Oh well.
8:00 PM
The golden rule, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you,” assumes that everyone likes to have the same thing done to them as what you would like them to do to you. But that doesn’t seem to apply to sadomasochism as well as other dominant-submissive or superior-inferior situations. Maybe the rule should be changed to “Do unto others what they prefer as you would have them do unto you what you prefer”. That makes more sense, doesn’t it?